Colorado Railroad Historical Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
846037753
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Golden, CO, USA
Phone
3032794591
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
History Museums

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$7,457,327
Expenses
$4,094,818
Assets
$20,381,639
Liabilities
$4,936,147

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • PAUL HAMMOND (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • KATY ZIEGLER (PRESIDENT)
  • LAUREN GIEBLER (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • PAUL HAMMOND (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $158,721 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the Colorado railroad historical foundation, inc. Is to preserve and convey the rich history of railroading in the rocky mountain region through acquisition, research, exhibition, and education.

What it reported doing in 2024

The museum exists to share Colorado's rich railroad heritage with the widest possible audience in a hands-on and three-dimensional fashion by preserving and making accessible important historic artifacts, artwork and documents, and by offering outstanding interpretive and educational programs to the community. The museum has systematically acquired a collection of over 100 historic railroad locomotives, passenger and freight cars dating from 1879 to the present, and also manages one of the largest archives of railroad print, photographic and research materials in the united states. It is dedicated to sharing Colorado's rich railroad history through the use of both small and large artifacts, along with archival materials associated with railroading in Colorado and the rocky mountain region. The museum's research library is the second largest of its kind, and library volunteers are recognized for their in-depth knowledge of western railroads and their lines. Authors of all genres may be found researching timetables, payroll records and photographs for their projects. The museum library is also home to an extensive collection of railroad related art, some of it painted by world-famous artists, and donated to the museum by dedicated collectors. This collection is sometimes loaned to other institutions in collaborative efforts. Since 1961 the museum has published over 50 scholarly books and pamphlets on the railroads of Colorado and the west that are internationally recognized by historians. The Colorado railroad museum has been ranked among the top 25 denver area attractions by denver business journal and as one of the top 10 paid attractions by visit denver.the Colorado railroad museum continues to focus on conservation and restoration of its full-size rail vehicle collection. The importance of restoration and maintenance of historic rolling stock cannot be overstated. By ensuring that visitors are able to view and sometimes ride painstakingly restored railroad artifacts, we are able to bring history to life and to inspire our guests to learn more about how railroads have transformed our state, the nation, and the entire world. Tour hosts address the ways in which railroads contributed to the dynamic economic, social, and agricultural changes in the american west, and helped create modern-day Colorado.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 57
  • Transparency & Controls: 79
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 79
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 44.8%; rating input score 45
  • Program expense ratio: 76.7%; rating input score 77
  • Fundraising efficiency: $20.18 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 45.1%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.98; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.24; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.9%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.7% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9.5% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.5% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 44.8% of revenue deployed · 76.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $3.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $159K · 11 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 45/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 59/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 39/100.