Colorado Friendship Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 453547798
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2011
- Location
- Longmont, CO, USA
- Phone
- 3035450242
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Meals on Wheels
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $362,840
- Expenses
- $344,948
- Assets
- $149,547
- Liabilities
- $16,581
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JIM WEGLARZ (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- DOUG OLDFIELD (MEMBER)
- GLENN STEINER (MEMBER)
- RON VEJROSTEK (MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We are committed to saving lives and reducing suffering throughout Colorado by providing food and clothing to those in need.
What it reported doing in 2025
Incredibles.this program provides bags of non-perishable food to food- insecure school children every friday, delivered directly to them at school. These children receive school meals while at school but might have little or no food at home over the weekend. This food helps to fill that gap so the children can return to school on monday morning ready to learn. We distributed 20,150 bags of food in 2025. We serve 650 children per week, at 12 schools each week during the school year. We continue to include high nutrition items in our bags such as tuna fish, beef jerky, peanuts, canned fruits, vegetables, milk boxes and peanut butter. The schools have requested that all items be non-perishable, single serving and easy to open and prepare so kids can do it themselves. We are constantly working to find products that fit these descriptions while providing good nutrition at a reasonable price. We are very happy to be partnering with "beef sticks for backpacks" who are providing us with 3,000 donated high quality beef sticks every month for our food bags. We also partner with conscious alliance for donated food items. At the end of 2025 we hels a very successful food drive at sam's club where we collected 23,000 in food items to help with our food bags in 2026. These are the schools we are currently serving in svvsd: indian peaks elementary school - 100 bags, timberline k-8 - 50 bags, rocky mountain elementary school - 75 bags, mountain view elementary school - 70 bags, burlington elementary school - 40 bags, columbine elementary school - 77 bags, northridge elementary school - 60 bags, fall river elementary school - 40 bags, alpine elementary school - 52 bags, mead elementary school - 40 bags, sandborn elementary school - 16 bags, and main street - 30 bags. The total equals 650 bags per week volunteers numbered 179 and total volunteer hours were 1,158.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 82.7%; rating input score 83
- Program expense ratio: 87%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: $14.82 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.9%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.43; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.6% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 82.7% of revenue deployed · 87% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $300K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2012 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 47/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 47/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 21/100.