Colorado-fayette Medical Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 741545266
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2010
- Forms available
- Form 990 2010
- Location
- Weimar, TX, USA
- Phone
- 9797259531
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Hospital, General
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $13,408,657
- Expenses
- $14,485,194
- Assets
- $7,171,703
- Liabilities
- $8,241,534
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide basic medical and surgical services to the residents of Central Texas, through the operation of a 38 bed acute-care hospital, a 100 bed long-term care facility, an outpatient center, a physical therapy and rehabilitation center, an assisted living facility, and two hospital-based rural health clinics.
What it reported doing in 2010
Provided outpatient services to residents of Flatonia and Schulenburg, Texas through operation of the Flatonia Community Clinic and Schulenberg Community Clinic. Services included X-Ray and laboratory testing.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 18
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -8%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.5; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.15; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.5%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $11.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $85K · 17 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 21/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 5/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.