Colorado Farm Bureau Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
208327307
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2021, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2011
Location
Centennial, CO, USA
Phone
3037497500
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Farm Bureau, Grange

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$113,701
Expenses
$60,792
Assets
$351,099
Liabilities
$1,442

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TAYLOR SZILAGYI (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT)
  • CARLYLE CURRIER (PRESIDENT)
  • JAMES HENDERSON (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • TAYLOR SZILAGYI (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT)
  • CARLYLE CURRIER (PRESIDENT)
  • JAMES HENDERSON (VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The foundation provides assistance to Colorado farmers and ranchers following major natural disasters in Colorado. Furthermore, the foundation provides funding foreducation programs within Colorado farm bureau and rural communities.

What it reported doing in 2024

The purposes for which the Colorado farm bureau foundation is organized is for scientific research, educational and other charitable purposes within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code of 1986, as amended (referred to as the "code"), including, but not limited to the following.specifically, the Colorado farm bureau foundation hopes to initiate and finance the following activities.1.) agricultural research and educational activities in such areas as production and marketing, quality and yield improvement, mechanization, farm safety, conservation and natural resources, improvement or better use of fertilizers, insecticides and herbicides, and ways and means of increasing net farm income.2.) to encourage and maintain a viable and progressive agricultural industry, to encourage on-the-farm use of application of basic research discoveries, to promote and finance the study of agriculture and research therein, the diffusion of knowledge thereof and the continuing education of farmers and ranchers.3.) to initiate and finance programs and activities that inform the public about the scope, diversity and importance of the agriculture industry through education curriculum, teacher training workshops, exhibits at various events, and other related activities.4.) to provide aid to individuals involved in production agriculture in the event of a catastrophic disaster impacting agricultural producers due to a natural event such as blizzard, flood or wildfire.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 97% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 69
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 85
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 52.4%; rating input score 52
  • Program expense ratio: 97.9%; rating input score 98

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 46.5%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.78; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 13.5% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 52.4% of revenue deployed · 97.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $60K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 52/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.