Colorado Environmental Professionals Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 841229898
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2016
- Location
- Denver, CO, USA
- Phone
- 3037598260
- Rating
- 45
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $47,325
- Expenses
- $32,009
- Assets
- $71,813
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROB SCHIMBERG (PRESIDENT)
- BRANDON SINKBEIL (PAST PRESIDENT)
- JAMES DEVALOIS (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ROB SCHIMBERG (PRESIDENT)
- BRANDON SINKBEIL (PAST PRESIDENT)
- JAMES DEVALOIS (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Cepa promtes and expands the interests of environmental contracting and consulting in Colorado. They disseminate accurate and reliable information concerning asbestos and other environmental hazards management, removal or abatement. They encourage continuing development of and adherence to appropriate standards of safety and quality in all activities relating to the environmental hazards management, removal or abatement industry.
What it reported doing in 2024
The organization conducts quarterly meetings to develop and educate industry leaders to promote appropriate standards of safety and quality.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 69% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and assets have declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 13
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 74
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 21.3%; rating input score 21
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 32.4%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.24; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.9% per year; rating input score 0; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 21.3% of revenue deployed
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 21/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.