Colorado Dream Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 742497109
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Denver, CO, USA
- Phone
- 3038615005
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,164,180
- Expenses
- $2,339,206
- Assets
- $2,058,394
- Liabilities
- $207,461
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KAYE TAAVIALMA (PRESIDENT AND CEO)
- DEREK SCHOONOVER (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- KAYE TAAVIALMA (PRESIDENT AND CEO): $173,973 total reported compensation
- STEPHANIE DREILING (VP OF FINANCE): $111,705 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We partner with youth and their families as they successfully navigate school, college, and career by providing a holistic academic, social, and emotional program from elementary school through college, along with post-secondary scholarship assistance.
What it reported doing in 2024
Colorado dream foundation was incorporated under the laws of the state of Colorado on february 29, 1988. Since our founding, we have been uniquely positioned to deliver results because of the long-lasting, deep relationships we build with families, starting in elementary school and continuing through college and into a career. Our program take place in out-of-school time settings, allowing us to utilize afternoons, evenings, and summers to work with our youth. Our commitment to supporting youth through their post-secondary journey means we continually adapt to meet their needs every step of the way. Our history of using data and evaluation to closely monitor academic and social-emotional growth positions us well to deliver consistent, measurable results. The foundation is supported primarily by private and public sector grants and donations and is committed to maintaining financial stability. Our diverse leadership team and board of directors provide operational oversight to ensure continuing financial health. In fy25, we served 467 youth and families across metro denver through four holistic, integrated service areas: -out-of-school time programming: provides daily academic enrichment, project-based learning, and social-emotional development for elementary through high school students. -college & career development: helps students explore their interests, set goals, and build real pathways toward higher education and future careers. -beyond dreams therapy: delivers culturally conscious, trauma-informed mental health care, with clinicians now embedded at two denver public school (dps) hubs and at rfma meeting students and families where they already feel safe. -restoring futures: our newest initiative addressing school truancy, providing court-involved youth with individualized, wraparound support to re-engage them in school and stabilize their lives. Fy202425 results we used several metrics to ensure we are successfully preparing youth for high school graduation and post-secondary success: -467 youth served across all programming: out-of-school time (167), summer camps (156), and therapy (144). -92% of youth served come from low-income households, underscoring the vital role our programs play in opening doors to brighter futures. -91% of youth served are first-generation college students, paving the way for new opportunities in higher education and beyond. -90% of youth maintained a daily school attendance rate of 95% or higher. -32 title i schools supported through after-school programming across denver, at no cost to families. -95% of families and youth were satisfied or very satisfied with our summer camp. -16,000 therapy sessions provided through beyond dreams therapy since september 2021; 87% of clients met one or more therapy goals. -100% of youth scored typical or strengths on the devereux student strengths assessment (dessa), demonstrating measurable social-emotional skill gains.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 78
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 27
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86.9%; rating input score 87
- Program expense ratio: 80.1%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: $8.96 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -8.1%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.88; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 12.2%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.6% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 86.9% of revenue deployed · 80.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 19 of 19 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $174K · 21 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 32 of 34 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 34/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule G fundraiser detail did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 24/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 58/100.