Colorado Clean Energy Cluster

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
263243017
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2014, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2018
Location
Fort Collins, CO, USA
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Energy Resources Conservation and Development

Reported finances

Revenue
$86,556
Expenses
$132,139
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Maury Dobbie (Executive Dir.)
  • Sara Emmons (Secretary)
  • Emily Wilson (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Colorado Clean Energy Cluster dba Shes in Power was formed to promote the clean energy sector and the growth of workforce in clean energy. We serve underrepresented women over 18 who want to make a difference in the clean energy industry. Women are historically underrepresented in the industry and a diverse workforce is key to a successful transition to clean energy. Our Power Up program matches women with short-term work experiences and mentors while providing professional development opportunities to jump start womens careers build their confidence and provide them support and inclusion.

What it reported doing in 2024

In 2022 the Board made critical organizational decisions to bounce back from COVID and create a sustainable plan. Shes In Power hired a new Executive Director who focused on developing a fundraising marketing and a program plan. Donors were re-engaged and new industry partners were formed. The Board added two new members. We lauched communications to promote our program and recruit participants for 2023.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 13
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -52.7%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -3.8% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -9.6% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.1% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.