Colonial Newfoundland Rescue Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 812340322
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2016
- Location
- Amissville, VA, USA
- Phone
- 7039671000
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Animal Protection and Welfare
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $182,973
- Expenses
- $42,833
- Assets
- $252,529
- Liabilities
- $4,052
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Donna McConn (President/Adoption Coordinator)
- Michele Miller (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Donna McConn (President/Adoption Coordinator)
- Michele Miller (Vice President)
- Robert Blaicher (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Newfoundland Dogs)
What it reported doing in 2025
Dog In-Home Care: Assist responsible Newfie Dog Owners in covering unanticipated, one-time, mostly medical expenses that the owners cannot afford to pay entirely on their own. Keeping a dog in its loving, familiar home, instead of giving it up to a rescue organization, is the preferable, and in most cases, the least expensive option. 3 dogs assisted in 2025.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 89% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 52
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 85
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 24.4%; rating input score 24
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 76.6%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.9; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 19.7% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 35.2% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 21.7% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 24.4% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 5 filed program accomplishments · $43K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 24/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 34/100.