Coloma Crescent Players Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
942447046
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Coloma, CA, USA
Phone
7607162793
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$131,493
Expenses
$109,851
Assets
$92,525

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JASON BOYER (President)
  • ALISHA MURRY (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • JASON BOYER (President)
  • ALISHA MURRY (Vice President)
  • RUBY JEAN DE QUIROZ (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Promote the arts by promoting and encouraging the art of traditional melodrama in a community theatre atmosphere. Offer education by having a gold rush education component to our programming for school districts. Encourage talent in all aspects of theatre arts. Participate in community affairs and enrichment. Provide for and maintain the olde coloma theatre.

What it reported doing in 2025

Promoted and encouraged the art of traditional melodrama in a community theatre atmosphere. Provided a gold rush education program that fits 4th grade California history curriculum requirements. Encouraged talent in all aspects of theatre arts. Participated in community affairs and enrichment. Provided for, repaired and maintained the olde coloma theatre.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 81
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 54
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 75%; rating input score 75
  • Program expense ratio: 89.7%; rating input score 90

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 16.5%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.84; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.5% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 75% of revenue deployed · 89.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $99K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2014 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.