Collington Square Non Prof Corp
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 521739469
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Baltimore, MD, USA
- Phone
- 4103426858
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $6,947
- Expenses
- $316,278
- Assets
- $632,933
- Liabilities
- $2,454,665
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STEPHEN JEFFERSON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- SHAJUANIA STOVALL (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- STEPHEN JEFFERSON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- BEVERLY MASON (SECRETARYTREASURER)
- JEFFERY COTTMAN Sr (MEMBER AT LARGE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To socially and economically empower single men, women, and children to establish a quality of life that will facilitate independence and sustainablity. Provide a safe haven in form of affordable apartment living; distributions boxed perishables
What it reported doing in 2024
Achieved service to more than 18 families monthly through transitional to permanent housing for homeless families, job opportunity workshops. Promoting economic sustainability for families through services, stewardship of resources, and shared responsibility. Collington square non profit corp has successfully served the community with but not limited to the following: sustained little to no drug trafficking with the community resources and church affiliations, thanksgiving and christmas holiday feeding to over 1,200 indviduals
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 18
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 65.3%; rating input score 65
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -4,452.7%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 3.88; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -12.7% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -10.7% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 65.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $207K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 15 of 16 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 34/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.