College Match
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 931388375
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Phone
- 3238046961
- Rating
- 54
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Educational Services and Schools - Other
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $814,347
- Expenses
- $5,490
- Assets
- $808,857
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
People named in this filing
- NADEEM KHAN (BOARD CHAIR)
- RICHARD BERGMAN (TREASURER)
- DOLORES ARRENDONDO (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
College match partners with high schools in los angeles county to identify high-achieving, low-income high school students and provide them with the necessary tools and guidance to get into top-ranked colleges with significant financial aid packages and succeed once there. College match does so through three main activates: college application support, financial support, and college success support.
What it reported doing in 2024
College application support entails working with students selected for college match to improve their changes of admission into top 4-year colleges. College match partners with public and charter high schools in the los angeles county and is currently partnered with 31 such high schools. School counselors identify high-achieving low-income students during their first semester of junior year, and the identified students can then apply to join college match. Once accepted, students begin receiving college application support, which runs from the second semester of junior year through high school graduation. College match pairs students with college counselors to help prepare and submit applications, gives students access to academic tutors and additional optional sat tutoring, and takes students on college visits (typically about 15 visits per student), including a trip the east coast, where college match covers the cost of the visit for the low-income students.financial support entails working with students in college match to make attending the college of their choice affordable and attainable. This includes helping students apply for financial aid, identifying grants and scholarships, and providing students with the opportunity to receive scholarship awards specific to college match. All students attend a financial aid workshop, receive individual support from volunteers to help analyze financial aid offers so that they understand the impact of each college choice, and are eligible for nomination by their counselor for college match scholarships.college success support entails working with students in college match who enroll in college to ensure they have the assistance needed to be successful. Right now, college success support consists of making emergency funding available to students in college match attending college, as discussed further in schedule h, providing access to peer-to-peer networks that offer social connection and advice, and being available to respond to student needs. Further, college match has launched the career launch initiative. The plan is to have a dedicated team to build out the career support pipeline. This team will be responsible for implementing year-round career preparation workshops and experiences including, but not limited, to networking events, summer internships, and alumni support groups.college match's activities are led by its program team, comprised of the program director, the director of high school partnerships, and the director of college partnerships. The program team is responsible for identifying eligible high school students, coordinating college visits, and training volunteers.the director of high school partnerships is more specifically involved with working with the high schools that partner with college match. The director of college partnerships is more specifically involved with building relationships with college admissions offices and advocating on behalf of students in college match. The program director fulfills a more general role.additionally, each member of the program team is responsible for serving as a college counselor for a cohort of students in college match. Volunteer counselors work with the remaining students in college match during the college application process, while academic tutoring is outsourced to a third-party tutoring service.the program director hosts the financial aid workshop, which is also supported by volunteers. The program director also trains these volunteers, who then work with students to analyze financial aid packages received. Staff members analyze scholarship applications and process payments.students in college match meet with their counselors and tutors, as well as with volunteers advising on financial aid, at their high school or in other locations that are convenient, including over online video calls. College visits occur all over the country and any ongoing programs or outreach to students in college match attending college tak
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 18
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 96
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0.7%; rating input score 1
- Program expense ratio: 52.6%; rating input score 53
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 99.3%; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 147.33; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 0.7% of revenue deployed · 52.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 14 of 14 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 1/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 53/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.