Collective Shift

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
474026785
IRS 990 coverage
2016–2018
Forms available
Form 990 2018
Location
Chicago, IL, USA
Phone
6036652687
Rating
69
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Family Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$3,289,277
Expenses
$5,065,389
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CONNIE YOWELL (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • CONNIE YOWELL (PRESIDENT): $234,838 total reported compensation
  • LARRY FRAZE (EMPLOYEE): $157,720 total reported compensation
  • GRANETTA BLEVINS (TREASURER): $135,000 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization's mission is to redesign social systems for the connected age.

What it reported doing in 2018

"lrng" is collective shift's first initiative and is a bold new endeavor to close the equity gap by transforming how young people access and experience learning, and the paths they can take to success. Working together with schools, city leaders, businesses, youth serving & community organizations, libraries and museums, lrng is building an ecosystem of learning that combines in-school, out-of-school, employer-based, and online learning experiences into a seamless network that is open and inviting to all youth. The lrng platform enables young people to access both local and national opportunities from their computer, smartphone, or tablet. Youth pursue their interests with mentors and peers, building new skills and habits wherever they are, whenever they want.our goal is to connect learning opportunities with access to career pathways to ensure that all young people, especially those from underserved communities, have inspiration and guidance to help them explore their interests, develop their passions, master critical 21st century competencies, and prepare for life and work in the modern economy. We focus on career and college readiness to empower the 21st century learner to co-design their own future while providing cities and businesses with a civic-minded and diverse workforce with relevant skills and experiences. In creating a sustainable platform, we strive to ensure training, mentoring, and learning experiences are deeply connected across our cities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 82% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. The required major-donor schedule is missing or incomplete and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 92
  • Transparency & Controls: 55
  • Accountability: 76
  • Sustainability: 3
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 84.9%; rating input score 85
  • Fundraising efficiency: $32.69 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: No; rating input score 0
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -54%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 15.1%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -23.9% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -45.5% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -65.8% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 84.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 2 of 3 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $235K · 11 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $163K reported
  • Consistency: 26 of 27 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2016 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Major donor itemization scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.