Collective Revival

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
992167041
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Spokane, WA, USA
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$129,528
Expenses
$108,198
Assets
$21,330

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

People named in this filing

  • John Enyart (Chairman)
  • Michelle Fleming (Secretary)
  • Jason Slater (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Collective Revival is a nonprofit organization created to help people in the Seattle Washington area develop a healthier mental state in larger groups. By organizing inspiring and fun social events the Organization aims to help people rediscover their love of connection with others as they find healing through this. We accomplish our mission by creating safe spaces in which people can feel secure slowly re-entering social lives outside their home. We want to help people feel comfortable by celebrating life with friends old and new. Long term we will continue curating inclusive events and activities to nurture healthy relationships.

What it reported doing in 2024

During the reporting period the organization hosted a large-scale community event that served approximately 3,800 individuals. This event was designed to provide meaningful support and engagement to members of the local community including programming aligned with the organizations mission aimed at improving overall well-being and quality of life. The event fostered community connection and inclusivity by bringing together diverse populations including underserved and vulnerable groups. Through strategic coordination with partners and local stakeholders the organization was able to efficiently deliver services at scale demonstrating its capacity to mobilize resources and create measurable impact. The high level of participation reflects both the ongoing need for such services and the organizations effectiveness in reaching and serving the community.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 90
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 45
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 83.5%; rating input score 84
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 16.5%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.2; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 83.5% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $108K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 18/100.