Collective Impact
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 208964069
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- San Francisco, CA, USA
- Phone
- 4155670400
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Youth Development Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $96,467
- Expenses
- $4,583,571
- Assets
- $195,381
- Liabilities
- $30,649
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
People named in this filing
- James Spingola (E.D. to 10/25)
- Renaud DeVreker (Dir. of Finance)
- Osayahde Nesbitt (Board Chair)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
At Collective Impact, our mission to empower underserved communities is realized through a range of programs that support youth, young adults and families in overcoming systemic barriers. Our core initiatives include Magic Zone, providing after school and summer academic support and enrichment for K12 students; MoMAGIC, a collaborative with the Public Defenders office working to reduce juvenile justice involvement; and the Ella Hill Hutch Community Center, a safe space for wellness and community connection. Through the Young Adult Workforce programs, we offer internships and job training to help students and young adults achieve academic and career success. Through Educational Pathways we help high school and college students overcome academic barriers through financial support, internships, and academic guidance. Brighter Future Families connects families with essential resources to promote financial stability and well-being, while the Dream Keeper Research Institute empowers Black co
What it reported doing in 2025
A. Summer ProgramsParticipants Served: 3,000 participants that are a part of our collaborative for theSummer. Here is a list of nonprofits that participate in our summer events that our program hosts: Prince Hall Booker T. Washington Community Service Center Village Project Boys and Girls Club: Fisher ClubHouse Boys and Girls Club: Tenderloin Clubhouse Up on Top Magic Zone (Collective Impact)B. Magic Zone (K-8) & After School Program: We are open daily until 6pm, Monday - Friday. The children are provided food and snacks daily which is vital to a lot of children in this community suffering from food insecurity. We provide after school van pick-ups for 31 children from eight different elementary schools throughout San Francisco.(K-8) In the Magic Zone after school program we currently have 50 kids enrolled which comes at no cost to the parents. One at Ella Hill, they are provided dedicated homework time where they are aided by our program staff - that offers encouragement and help with their assignments. In addition, our program team engages them in weekly fun, thoughtful activities curated by them. These activities range from spoken word, reading time, movie day, and gym time- allowing them to engage and play with the friends they only get to see while at Collective Impact.High School (Teen) Program we currently have 45 teens enrolled in our Workforce Education program - that boasts a 100% employment and graduation rate. The teens earn bi-weekly stipends for their participation in the program. This creates an incentive for them to come to Ella Hill Hutch instead of engaging in illicit activities after school as a way to earn money. Once here they are provided a safe space to do homework and engage in enrichment/extracurricular activities. While obtaining mentorship and guidance from program leads as well as the entire Collective Impact staff at large.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 64
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 6
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 4.6%; rating input score 5
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -4,651.4%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.04; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.16; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 11.4%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 16.8% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 4.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $212K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 5/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 13/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is recorded as not currently operating in California.