Collective Action for Education
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 993545111
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Providence, RI, USA
- Phone
- 4012467834
- Rating
- 56
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $525,131
- Expenses
- $198,028
- Assets
- $353,622
- Liabilities
- $26,519
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- VICTOR CAPELLAN (DIRECTOR & CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
Highest reported compensation
- VICTOR CAPELLAN (DIRECTOR & CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $20,000 total reported compensation
- JOSE R POLANCO (DIRECTOR): $15,000 total reported compensation
- CAROL AGUASVIVAS (DIRECTOR): $15,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to empower communities to harness their collective power to transform Rhode Island's education system, ensuring it serves all children in our state- regardless of their background or zip code.
What it reported doing in 2024
Objective 2024the collective action for education (cafe), a 501(c)(4) founded in 2024, is dedicated to reshaping Rhode Island's education system so it serves every child, regardless of background or zip code. The organization seeks to empower communities to harness their collective power, ensuring education policy decisions reflect the needs and aspirations of families statewide. In its first year, cafe's short-term objectives were to: -establish its name and credibility with communities, leaders, and decision-makers. -build organizational infrastructure, including staff, consultants, and communication tools. Begin community outreach and civic education focused on how education issues affect children in Rhode Island. -launch the design of the educhamps program (to begin in 2025) to train and support emerging education advocates. -develop issue priorities to guide legislative and community education efforts. The long-term goal is to create a durable network of informed, engaged rhode islanders who will sustain year-round advocacy on education issues, with cafe serving as a trusted convener and resource. Program service accomplishments:1. Building organizational infrastructure -hired and onboard an initial management team and consultants, establishing the systems and processes needed to guide the organization forward. -developed a bilingual communications capacity (english and spanish) to ensure inclusivity across Rhode Island's diverse communities. -established a new website and digital presence, which received approximately 2,000 visits in its first three months (estimated).2. Community engagement and education- attended an estimated 8 community events and festivals during summer and fall 2024, directly engaging with over 1,000 residents to share information about education issues and opportunities for involvement. -hosted a bilingual community event at farm fresh ri that reached more than 200 attendees, providing resources on how education policy impacts families. -launched an online "take action" hub, which attracted over 1,900 unique visitors in the final quarter of 2024 (based on digital analytics).3. Development of the educhamps program (launch 2025) -created a program design for educhamps, a leadership and organizing training initiative. -designed curriculum components to prepare participants for roles such as serving on education task forces, joining nonprofit boards, or leading grassroots efforts in their communities.4. Civic and legislative education -began issue education with community members, highlighting three priority areas in state education policy.-conducted educational outreach to an estimated 10,000 Rhode Island residents through bilingual mail, digital content, and in-person activities (estimated). -initiated meetings with more than 30 community leaders and stakeholders, building relationships that will inform and strengthen cafe's priorities in 2025 and beyond.impact and story of 2024in its founding year, cafe demonstrated that communities across Rhode Island are eager for an inclusive, transparent voice in education policy. By combining infrastructure development, community engagement, and the early stages of leadership pipeline building, cafe laid the groundwork for long-term advocacy. The organization's early investments in bilingual communications and its presence at community events fostered trust and positioned cafe as a credible advocate. Importantly, the work of 2024 ensures that the educhamps program will launch in 2025 with a strong foundation, creating a new generation of leaders ready to shape education decisions at every level.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 57
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 10
- Sustainability: 69
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 32.4%; rating input score 32
- Program expense ratio: 85.9%; rating input score 86
- Fundraising efficiency: $262.55 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Limited
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 62.3%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.79; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 25.2%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 32.4% of revenue deployed · 85.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 3 board members independent · 2 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $170K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $20K · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 17 of 17 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 32/100.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 46/100.