Collaboration Healthcare Corp
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 871932619
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- New Canaan, CT, USA
- Phone
- 2039472147
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Mental Health Center
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $241,420
- Expenses
- $190,089
- Assets
- $545,073
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
20 people listed
People named in this filing
- KAREN BAUCE (CHAIR)
- VICTORIA HOEY (VICE CHAIR)
- MACKENZIE GORDON (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provide free health services through a range of care. Care provided includes primary care, behavioral and mental health services, substance abuse counseling, and medication management. A community of volunteers provides services to adults, expectant mothers, teens, and children.
What it reported doing in 2024
Education - sage healthcare affiliates with local universities to provide didactic and clinical experiences for nurse practitioner, social work and other health discipline students supervised by either university faculty or sage volunteers. Follow-up and research is performed to assess community wellness improvement based on our free services provided. Costs include maintaining staffing in the clinic that can coordinate scheduling. Additional costs include data collection and maintenance, report writing and results dissemination. Sage has affiliations via memorandums of understanding (mous) with 9 universities including yale, fairfield, sacred heart, quinnipiac, iona, albertus magnus, bridgeport, capella, wilkes and is pursuing other affiliations. This has allowed us to host over 160 healthcare students in 2024 to perform there clinical education hours.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 47% for direct work, and 53% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 62
- Transparency & Controls: 80
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 73
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 60.7%; rating input score 61
- Program expense ratio: 77.1%; rating input score 77
- Fundraising efficiency: $6.02 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 77.1%; rating input score 77; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 21.3%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.87; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 62.1% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -86% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.9% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 60.7% of revenue deployed · 77.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 20 of 20 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $147K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 20 people listed
- Consistency: 20 of 23 current checks pass · 3 findings to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 26/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule G fundraiser detail did not reconcile in the filed values.