Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 112013303
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Aug 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA
- Phone
- 5163678448
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Biological & Life Sciences
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $232,693,889
- Expenses
- $199,781,370
- Assets
- $1,368,966,306
- Liabilities
- $220,789,493
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
42 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BRUCE STILLMAN PHD (CEO AND TRUSTEE)
Highest reported compensation
- BRUCE STILLMAN PHD (CEO AND TRUSTEE): $1,139,136 total reported compensation
- JOHN TUKE (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $693,193 total reported compensation
- DAVID TUVESON (SCIENTIST): $620,579 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To make life better through scientific discovery and education.
What it reported doing in 2024
Other programs school of biological sciences: the cshl school of biological sciences (sbs) trains the next generation of biologists, offering a ph.d. In biology in as little as 4 years to a limited number of accomplished students (approximately 50) drawn from around the world. The curriculum is designed to train self-confident, self-reliant young scientists to become scholars and to acquire the knowledge that their research and future careers demand. Our graduates are well prepared to enter a wide array of careers that include academic research, biotech, pharma, consulting, and publishing. Students at cshl explore career options and acquire professional skills through several means, such as the career and skills development course, the career directions series and the bioscience enterprise club. The school of biological sciences provides students with opportunities for experiential learning and internships. Banbury center: banbury center, located on the grounds of the historic robertson house, provides opportunities for scientists and other leaders in society to discuss topics of common interest. Approximately twenty meetings are organized each year, for groups between 20-30 participants. The conferences are recognized internationally as being among the world's best discussion workshops for topics in molecular biology, molecular genetics, human genetics, neuroscience and science policy.dna learning center: the dna learning center (dnalc) has a major impact not only in the New York metropolitan area, but also globally in pioneering public science education for the genome age. With teaching facilities on long island and New York city, it brings a hands-on approach to learning about biology and genomes to classrooms and homes of children in primary schools, middle schools and high schools. Renowned for devising means for young people, teachers and parents to conduct sophisticated experiments with dna, the dnalc also has a robust presence on the internet, powered by a team of multimedia innovators who bring knowledge of the life sciences to computer, tablet and cell phone users.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 97% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 98
- Sustainability: 77
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84.3%; rating input score 84
- Program expense ratio: 82.2%; rating input score 82
- Fundraising efficiency: $66.19 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 6 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: 0 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Claims monitoring procedures: Fail
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Fail
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 96.8%; rating input score 97; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 14.1%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.85; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.16; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.2%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 10 programs and campaigns described on the official site
- Where the money goes: 84.3% of revenue deployed · 82.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 30 of 31 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $164.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.1M · 42 people listed · 6 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $4.1M reported
- Consistency: 43 of 43 current checks pass
- Schedules: 13 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 38 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 27 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 8 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 35/100.