Colab
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 263934828
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Chattanooga, TN, USA
- Phone
- 4232810811
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Arts, Cultural Organizations - Multipurpose
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,203,929
- Expenses
- $1,386,959
- Assets
- $528,414
- Liabilities
- $234,152
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TASIA MALAKASIS (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
Highest reported compensation
- TASIA MALAKASIS (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $225,038 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our vision is to put chattanooga at the forefront of cutting-edge technologies to improve our ecosystem with advances in sustainable mobility, to be the best sustainable mobility startup accelerator in the world, and to build a diverse and inclusive future by supporting scalable businesses in the greater chattanooga region. Co.lab is recognized as a top 10 accelerator in the country.
What it reported doing in 2024
Intrapreneurship workshop: co.lab is developing a custom-made workshop aimed at helping innovators within a large organization learn more about the necessary business tools needed to ideate, refine, and implement organizational innovations. This is a full-day workshop tailored to each organization based on their specific internal needs, keeping in mind the nuances within change management. The first pilot program had a fantastic reception from tva with 60 participants. Co.starters: we offer a program to ten counties, providing entrepreneurs with a supportive community, an organized framework, and a sense of responsibility as they transform their ideas into reality. This program facilitates the journey from conceptualization to business launch through a series of bootcamp sessions guided by co.lab and respected local business professionals, who impart valuable knowledge on various business concepts to the participants. Kiva: co.lab is the only kiva hub in the state of Tennessee. Kiva is a nontraditional online lending platform that uses crowdfunded microloans as a force for good. Kiva creates a space where people can have a tangible impact on each other and ultimately financial access for all. Entrepreneurs can be connected to lenders across the globe and can apply for crowdfunded loans of up to $15,000.00 at 0% interest for terms up to 36 months.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 62% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 59
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 15
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 67.3%; rating input score 67
- Program expense ratio: 58.9%; rating input score 59
- Fundraising efficiency: $6.19 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -15.2%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.38; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.44; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 16.2%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.1% per year; rating input score 100; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.8% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -3% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 67.3% of revenue deployed · 58.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $817K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $225K · 16 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $175K reported
- Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 59/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 23/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 18/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 20/100.