Coginchaug Soccer Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 061254201
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- Middlefield, CT, USA
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $100,743
- Expenses
- $111,681
- Assets
- $45,543
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Andrew Ehler (President)
- Kelly Aingworth (Vice President and Registrar)
People named in this filing
- Andrew Ehler (President)
- Kelly Aingworth (Vice President and Registrar)
- Jennifer Casillo (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the Coginchaug Soccer Club is to promote the game of soccer within the towns of Durham and Middlefield and to provide a positive soccer experience for all Club participants. The Club will promote the development of coaching and individual player skills to enhance team play and the overall soccer experience. The Club will emphasize fun at all levels of play good sportsmanship physical fitness healthy attitudes and teamwork.
What it reported doing in 2024
Provided deserving students who met the threshold for volunteer involvement and membership participation with financial assistance for higher education. Provide recognition awards to outstanding members coaches and volunteers. 8 members
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 96% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and assets have declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 91
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 33
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 93.9%; rating input score 94
- Program expense ratio: 84.7%; rating input score 85
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -10.9%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.41; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 25.2% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 30.4% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -6% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 93.9% of revenue deployed · 84.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $95K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 15/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.