Coding in Color

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
823892077
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Avondale, AZ, USA
Phone
6025168317
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Educational Services and Schools - Other

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$87,175
Expenses
$87,622
Assets
$45,730
Liabilities
$482

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DIANA L GUZMAN (President & CEO)
  • MAURICIO PINON (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • DIANA L GUZMAN (President & CEO)
  • MAURICIO PINON (Vice President)
  • DOMINICK DENNISUR (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Coding in Color is a local nonprofit that aims to expose more students to the world of computer science, with the ultimate goal of increasing diversity in the tech industry.

What it reported doing in 2025

Interacted with 100+ students and parents at Galaxy STEM Fest to showcase the organization's mission and services. Students and parents interacted with circuits and robotics. Interacted with 20+ students and parents at Lakin Prep Academy, Interacted with 20+ students and parents part of the Salt River High School community to showcase, Interacted with 100+ students and parents at MIKITZLI Festival, to showcase the organization's mission and services.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0.5%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.52; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 49.1%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 35.6% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 39.6% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 43.5% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 12 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 25/100.