Codestock Corporation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 462293521
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2018, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Knoxville, TN, USA
- Phone
- 8653779224
- Rating
- 61
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- General Science
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $110,610
- Expenses
- $21,128
- Assets
- $135,252
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DON DEN UYL II (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- DON DEN UYL II (PRESIDENT)
- BRAD MILLER (SPONSORSHIP)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Codestock corporation's purpose is to provide education to computer science engineers, computer application developers, and other types of engineers by giving lectures, slideshows, and other educational material in schools, libraries, and other public venues, as well as utilizing social media channels and the corporation's website to provide facts, statics, and other related data on the continuing change in the computer application development field.
What it reported doing in 2025
Annual technology conference for developers. The conference spans two full days and is packed with technical and entrepreneurial content. In most years, there were over 800 attendees with a host of speakers presenting on various topics that span the gamut from best practice enterprise software development to cutting edge web techniques to managing a technical entrepreneurial endeavor.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 46
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 82
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 18%; rating input score 18
- Program expense ratio: 94.2%; rating input score 94
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 80.9%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.4; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -9.1% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -6.6% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 18% of revenue deployed · 94.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $20K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2014 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 18/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.