Coastline Volleyball Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
991196793
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Hubert, NC, USA
Phone
9107082684
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Amateur Sports

Reported finances

Revenue
$279,220
Expenses
$250,705
Assets
$87,375
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOSEPH J PADILLA (PRESIDENT/CLUB DIRECTOR)
  • JENNIFER SHUGART (VICE PRESIDENT/CLUB ADMINISTRATOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • JOSEPH J PADILLA (PRESIDENT/CLUB DIRECTOR): $44,730 total reported compensation
  • JENNIFER SHUGART (VICE PRESIDENT/CLUB ADMINISTRATOR): $10,900 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Coastline Volleyball Club, Inc. provides youth athletes with access to organized volleyball training, coaching, camps, clinics, tournaments, and mentorship programs. The organization's mission is to develop volleyball skills, confidence, teamwork, leadership, discipline, and positive character through amateur sports participation while promoting a safe and supportive environment for youth athletes throughout eastern North Carolina.

What it reported doing in 2025

Coastline Volleyball Club, Inc. provided organized youth volleyball training, competitive travel teams, camps, clinics, tournaments, and mentorship opportunities for youth athletes throughout eastern North Carolina during 2025. The organization operated developmental and competitive volleyball programs designed to improve athletic performance, teamwork, leadership, discipline, sportsmanship, and self-confidence. Athletes participated in practices, skills clinics, strength and conditioning activities, regional and national tournaments, and team-building opportunities under the supervision of qualified coaches and instructors. The organization also maintained a dedicated volleyball training facility to support year-round athletic development and provide expanded access to amateur youth volleyball opportunities within the local community.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 76
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 26
  • Sustainability: 43
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 82.2%; rating input score 82
  • Program expense ratio: 91.6%; rating input score 92
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 10.2%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.35; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 22.2%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 48.8% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 31% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 39% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 82.2% of revenue deployed · 91.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 3 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $251K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $45K · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 41 of 41 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 19/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.