Coastal Volleyball Club of Delaware
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 842695811
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- Magnolia, DE, USA
- Phone
- 3028570838
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Amateur Sports
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $150,313
- Expenses
- $101,743
- Assets
- $100,229
- Liabilities
- $1,900
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DREXEL SIOK (PRESIDENT)
- AMY DIEM (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- DREXEL SIOK (PRESIDENT)
- MARY PARDEE (TREASURER)
- KELLY BAUGHMANN (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Coastal volleyball club is organized exclusively for charitable and educational purposes to provide youth athletes in Delaware and the surrounding communities with opportunities to participate in competitive volleyball programs that promote physical fitness, teamwork, leadership, discipline, and sportsmanship. The organization offers training, coaching, clinics, and tournament participation designed to develop volleyball skills and personal growth in a safe and supportive environment. Revenue generated by the organization is used solely to support program operations, including facility rentals, equipment, uniforms, tournament expenses, coaching compensation, and other youth development activities.
What it reported doing in 2023
The organization operated a nonprofit youth volleyball club that provided training, competition, and development opportunities for local athletes. Programs promoted teamwork, sportsmanship, physical fitness, and character development through practices, tournaments, clinics, and community engagement activities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 81% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Member-benefit provider. The nonprofit used 86% of its reported program spending for member benefits.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 69
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 66.4%; rating input score 66
- Program expense ratio: 98.1%; rating input score 98
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 32.3%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.99; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -2.3% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 43.5% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 88.9% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 66.4% of revenue deployed · 98.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $100K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2022 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 58/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 39/100.