Coast Forensic League
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 901075270
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2016–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- San Jose, CA, USA
- Phone
- 4155315224
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Student Services, Organizations of Students
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $99,549
- Expenses
- $91,861
- Assets
- $133,430
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ARTEM RASKIN (PRESIDENT)
- JURRIEN LE (VICE PRESIDENT OF CONGRESS)
- TIMOTHY ZHU (VICE PRESIDENT OF TOPICS)
People named in this filing
- ARTEM RASKIN (PRESIDENT)
- JYLESSA HAMPTON (SECRETARY)
- SOPHIA LO (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
O to promote the best interest of the high schools within its boundaries, the teaching profession, and the participant students by providing interscholastic speech and debate tournaments.
What it reported doing in 2024
O coast forensic league (cfl) organizes speech and debate tournaments for high school students. This is spelled out in article ii section b of its articles of incorporation, which states that "coast forensic league shall promote the best interest of the high schools within its boundaries, the teaching profession, and the participant students by providing interscholastic speech and debate tournaments." cfl serves high schools in san mateo, monterey, san benito, santa clara, and santa cruz counties (see article ii section 1 of the bylaws). The term 'forensic' in the name of this organization refers to speech and debate.o all cfl members are either public high schools or nonprofit private high schools that are accredited in California (see article ii section 1 of the bylaws). Speech and debate programs at cfl member schools are supported by their school administrations as promoting an educational activity and each program has a teacher adviser. To join cfl, each speech and debate program must obtain written permission from its school administrator (see cfl membership form).o in the 2024-25 academic year, cfl organized 15 two-day speech and debate tournaments, typically on the weekends. The tournament season runs from september to march. Tournaments are normally held on high school campuses. In total, cfl serves about 3,000 students each year from 50 schools. About 200 competitors will attend a given tournament.o the tournaments are run by league officers (listed in part iv of the 990-ez form). The officers are elected annually by the members and are unpaid volunteers. The duties of the officers are listed in article xxi of the board code. Organizing tournaments takes over 90% of the time cfl officers spend volunteering for the league.o speech and debate is an educational activity designed to teach students public speaking and evidence-based, logical argument. In debate events, a student is assigned a topic rooted in subjects such as economics, philosophy, science, or international relations and is asked to defend one side of an issue against an opponent who takes the opposite position. In platform speech events, a student prepares an original speech on a societal problem of their choice and proposes their solution to the problem. In extemporaneous speech events, a student is assigned a domestic or foreign policy issue, and, after 30 minutes of preparation and research, delivers a speech analyzing the issue. In all speech and debate events, students are then evaluated by judges who determine how well students argued, spoke, and leveraged their source materials.o speech and debate tournaments provide students with the opportunity to compete against students and be evaluated by judges from other high schools and thus to be exposed to new styles of speaking and argumentation. The judging pool at tournaments consists of school teachers, speech and debate coaches, parent volunteers, and other members of the community.o cfl seeks to ensure that its tournaments are affordable to all students. The standard entry fee at a cfl tournament is $13 per student. For comparison, a typical tournament run independently by a school will cost $100 per student or more. These entry fees provide the bulk of the revenue cfl uses to carry on its activities (see part i of form 990-ez). Since these entry fees are voted on by the same member schools which then pay them when they register for tournaments, there is no incentive to raise the entry fees any higher than is necessary to cover the costs of renting tournament facilities and covering other tournament costs. In addition, article ii section b of the cfl articles of incorporation states that cfl shall have "a particular focus on supporting high schools and students who are socioeconomically disadvantaged." cfl grants 100% membership dues and tournament entry fee waivers to any schools with a high proportion of students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 89% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 91
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 59
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87.5%; rating input score 88
- Program expense ratio: 94.8%; rating input score 95
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.7%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.45; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 18.7% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 87.5% of revenue deployed · 94.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $87K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.