Coalition to Restore Coastal Louisiana
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 721115589
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- New Orleans, LA, USA
- Phone
- 5042616812
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Water Resource, Wetlands Conservation and Management
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,626,449
- Expenses
- $3,714,668
- Assets
- $1,470,234
- Liabilities
- $150,682
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
20 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- KIMBERLY DAVIS REYHER (EXECUTIVE DI): $170,520 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the coalition to restore coastal Louisiana (crcl) is to unite people in action to achieve a thriving, sustainable Louisiana coast for all.
What it reported doing in 2024
Future coastal leaders program: crcl's future coastal leaders (fcl) program is a leadership, education, and career development initiative focused on engaging public high school and undergraduate students, including those enrolled in community colleges, with interest in coastal restoration. Its purpose, through experiential learning, is to highlight the plentiful careers and/or degrees that exist in addressing coastal and environmental issues. From engineers, scientists, accountants, to architects and non-profit leaders, crcl hopes to motivate the next generation of students to choose coastal restoration as their profession. Crclectures crcl hosts lectures in different locations around south Louisiana, sharing interesting subject matter in a way that connects new people to the movement to restore coastal Louisiana. Coastal leadership institute crcl's cli is a professional development program that provides participants with the deep knowledge and skills necessary to be leaders in coastal restoration. The class is comprised of 30 residents from across Louisiana's coast working in careers including engineering, arts, education and economic development. They will join eight sessions over the course of a year, with guest speakers and in-the-field experiences that will introduce them to the different facets of Louisiana's coast: ecology, culture, industry and policy. Policy / outreach / education: crcl educates decision makers about the importance of coastal restoration in Louisiana. It interacts directly with members of the community to inform them about coastal land loss and projects that are aimed at restoring the coast. The communications team shares information about volunteer projects and large-scale restoration efforts through social media, mass emails and traditional media. The organization provides expertise to journalists writing about the coastal crisis. Crcl uses social media, email and printed communications to expand its base of volunteers and supporters. Crcl hosts the biennial state of the coast conference to provide an interdisciplinary forum to exchange timely and relevant information on the dynamic conditions of Louisiana's coastal communities, environment, and economy and to apply that information to existing and future coastal restoration and protection efforts, policies, and decision-making. Crcl also hosts a one-day summit in southwest Louisiana.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 96% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 97
- Sustainability: 29
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 82.5%; rating input score 83
- Program expense ratio: 80.3%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: $8.82 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 95%; rating input score 95; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2.4%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.4; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.6%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -3.4% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 82.5% of revenue deployed · 80.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 19 of 20 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $171K · 20 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $955K reported
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 34/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 58/100.