Coalition Of Community Corrections Providers of New Jersey Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
223206318
IRS 990 coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2020
Location
Trenton, NJ, USA
Phone
6093968900
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Prison Alternatives

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$880,657
Expenses
$871,994
Assets
$103,274
Liabilities
$70,713

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Kevin M McHugh (Executive Director)
  • Richard P McCourt (Vice President)
  • Walter Simpkins (President)

Highest reported compensation

  • Kevin M McHugh (Executive Director): $75,000 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote new methodologies and improved outcomes in corrections and to improve the skills and expertise of corrections professionals and others by education, assessment of new methodologies and other programs directed at improving correctional environments .

What it reported doing in 2024

Our member agencies operate more than 30 community-based programs throughout the state of New Jersey, serving approximately 9,000 offenders annually. The programs offered by our member agencies include: Residential Community Release Programs (RCRPs), Community Resource Centers (CRCs), Stages to Enhance Parolee Success (STEPS) programs and ReEntry Substance Abuse Program (RESAP), which are all contracted either through the New Jersey Department of Corrections or the New Jersey State Parole Board. Residential Community Release Programs (RCRPs) RCRPs, also known as halfway houses, are residential facilities that have been specifically designed to provide a safe, structured and service-rich environment to assist inmates nearing release with their transition back to the community. Under contract through the New Jersey Department of Corrections, RCRPs have been an integral part of New Jersey's correctional system for the past 38 years - playing a vital role in the 40% reduction of the prison population. At the same time, these treatment programs have contributed to a marked improvement in public safety, as evidenced by a 37% reduction in the offender recidivism rates and dramatically lower state crime rates. Currently, our member agencies operate a total of 13 RCRPs located throughout the state with a capacity for 1,753 beds. Community Resource Centers Community Resource Centers (CRCs) are non-residential treatment programs for higher risk parole clients living in the community. Through CRCs, parolees also receive essential case management services that connect them to healthcare, employment and housing services, while ensuring compliance in meeting supervision requirements. Currently, our member agencies operate ten CRCs across the state, serving more than 3,000 clients annually. Stages to Enhance Parolee Success (STEPS) STEPS programs are contracted through the New Jersey State Parole Board and provide supportive residential services to parolees transitioning back into the community. ReEntry Substance Abuse Program (RESAP) RESAP is also contracted through the New Jersey State Parole Board and designed for parolees who have violated the conditions of their parole and experienced a substance abuse relapse. RESAP offers these individuals with a structured alternative to reincarceration, providing supportive residential services to ensure a smooth transition back into the community as well as additional services to address the substance abuse (treatment and support). RESAP provides an intensive and comprehensive approach to substance abuse, addiction and relapse prevention - offering a continuum of supportive programs and services, along with appropriate levels of case management and supervision, that ensures both a positive transition process and long-term success.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 97% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 68% for direct work, and 32% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 87
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 26
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 96.6%; rating input score 97
  • Program expense ratio: 97.5%; rating input score 98
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.12; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.68; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.6%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -27.2% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -27.5% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -29.4% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 96.6% of revenue deployed · 97.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $851K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $75K · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 39/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 11/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 41/100.