Coalition of Accreditation Managers of Massachusetts Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
043070048
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Walpole, MA, USA
Phone
5086603037
Rating
36
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Limited

Reported finances

Revenue
$11
Expenses
$0
Assets
$11,164
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Jeffrey A Hutnick (President)

People named in this filing

  • Jeffrey A Hutnick (President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Coalition of Accreditation Managers of Massachusetts is a nonprofit organization that, for almost 20 years, has mentored hundreds of Accreditation Managers in Massachusetts, surrounding states and beyond, to achieve and maintain accreditation with their chosen respective Accreditation programs. The Coalition is Massachusetts only independent accreditation institution not directly affiliated or associated with Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies (CALEA), or any other credentialing commission or organization. Being an independent organization allows us to be successful in mentoring and assisting with compliance needs within several accreditation programs without compromising the integrity of those program. We also pride ourselves on providing compliance assistance and mentoring with agencies that are not yet in any process to achieve accreditation but are looking to enhance their professional excellence through policy and guidelines within their departments.

What it reported doing in 2025

We independently and confidentially serve the needs of public safety organizations and their chief executive officers, whether seeking accreditation or not, as a means to pursue professional excellence. We encourage the fortitude of leadership and networking within this intricate nexus with prevailing goal of professionalism at its highest level.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 8
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: Limited
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 15.2% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.