Antioch University
Legal name: Coalition for the Common Good
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 310536640
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Yellow Springs, OH, USA
- Phone
- 9377691340
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Undergraduate College (4-year)
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $82,943,144
- Expenses
- $88,560,301
- Assets
- $67,565,843
- Liabilities
- $34,641,334
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
24 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOHN COMERFORD (PRESIDENT)
- WILLIAM GROVES (VICE PRESIDENT)
- CHESTER HASKELL (VICE PRESIDENT UNTIL 4/25)
- WENDY SHERMAN-HECKLER (VICE PRESIDENT)
- JEFFERSON BLACKBURN-SMITH (VICE PRESIDENT)
- SHAWN FITZGERALD (DEAN & CAMPUS CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- JOHN COMERFORD (PRESIDENT): $449,142 total reported compensation
- WILLIAM GROVES (VICE PRESIDENT): $367,655 total reported compensation
- ALLAN GOZUM (TREASURER): $279,460 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We are educating to fuel positive change and a better world for everyone.
What it reported doing in 2024
On june 30, 2023, antioch university changed its corporate name to coalition for the common good (coalition), but continues to do business as antioch university as a tax-exempt entity using the same employer identification number (EIN) and office of postsecondary education identification (ope id). The broader mission of the coalition is to be the first national higher education system of affiliated private, nonprofit colleges and universities, bound by a common mission of promoting democracy, social justice, equity, inclusion, and engaged global citizenship. Specific to antioch university's mission, it continues to provide learner centered education to adult students across the country and around the world, via online and from its five campuses. Antioch is guided by its core values of excellence in teaching and learning, nurturing student achievement, supporting scholarship and service, a commitment to social engagement, and building and serving inclusive communities. As the coalition develops, so will the number of degrees/programs offered by antioch university, serving as the graduate school for the system.the coalition of the common good (dba antioch university) provides learner-centered education to empower students with the knowledge and skills to lead meaningful lives and to advance social, racial, economic, and environmental justice. Antioch university was founded in 1852 in yellow springs, Ohio. Its first president was horace mann, the father of public education in the united states, who deeply believed that education was the cornerstone of a strong american democracy. Today, antioch is a national university with campuses in keene, nh; los angeles and santa barbara, ca; seattle, wa; and yellow springs, oh, as well as numerous low-residency and online programs. Campuses fulfill the mission by serving the educational needs of the communities in their regions; the online programs expand access to education through high-quality, affordable, and flexible education. Antioch enrolls close to 4,600 post-traditional age students in a wide variety of professional doctoral and master's programs, in an undergraduate degree completion program, and in professional certificates and endorsements. The university's mission is guided by the core values of excellence in teaching and learning, nurturing student achievement, supporting scholarship and service, a commitment to social engagement, and building and serving inclusive communities. A bold and enduring source of innovation in higher education, antioch university is a private, nonprofit institution and has been continuously accredited by the higher learning commission since 1927.creating the coalition for the common goodantioch university and otterbein university laid the groundwork to co-found the coalition for the common good (ccg), the first national higher education system of affiliated private, nonprofit colleges and universities that, through collaboration and integration, provide transformative education and lifelong learning. The coalition for the common good is dedicated to promoting democracy, social justice, equity, inclusion, and engaged global citizenship. Unbound by geography, the ccg will use the combined resources of the member institutions to develop and deliver targeted educational and professional development programs that meet the unique requirements of our communities through academic partnerships with local businesses and employers. Through the coalition for the common good, the universities have moved from being competitors to collaborators for the betterment of students and communities. Built on the faculty expertise of both institutions, the ccg combines members' graduate programs to form a graduate division with a national scope, operated by antioch university. The coalition for the common good will also collaborate on building or acquiring new programs that will benefit students. The coalition for the common good will expand to include other colleges and u
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 93% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 96% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 76
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 22
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 90.9%; rating input score 91
- Program expense ratio: 85.7%; rating input score 86
- Fundraising efficiency: $6.66 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Fail
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -6.8%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.76; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.51; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.4%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 2 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 90.9% of revenue deployed · 85.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $75.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $449K · 24 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $2.6M reported
- Consistency: 42 of 42 current checks pass
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 12 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 7 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 30/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 33/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 35/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.