Coalition for Nonprofit Housing And

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
521750323
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Washington, DC, USA
Phone
2027450902
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Housing, Shelter N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,516,437
Expenses
$6,222,354
Assets
$4,779,896
Liabilities
$1,158,505

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

22 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Stephen Glaude (President and CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • Stephen Glaude (President and CEO): $338,634 total reported compensation
  • Jherrica Spikes (Chief Operating Officer): $298,625 total reported compensation
  • Maya Brennan (Chief Housing Officer): $234,029 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

CNHED has achieved successes that combines effective advocacy, policy making, public education, capacity building, information and analysis, and engages members and allies in a practical manner to help ensure that low-income residents have housing and economic opportunities.

What it reported doing in 2025

DC Community Anchor Partnership: The Coalitions DC Community Anchor Partnership (DCAP) is a collaborative of local anchor institutions hospitals, universities, and utility companies harnessing their purchasing power to grow DC-based small- and medium-sized businesses. Led by The Coalition and co-convened with the Deputy Mayor for Planning and Economic Development (DMPED), DCAP works with its Anchor Members. The hospitals and universities in the District of Columbia collectively spend more than $2B on goods and services every year, but a small percentage goes to locally owned DC businesses. This perpetuates the lack of diversity and competition in the Districts procurement ecosystem.ngineer institutional procurement systems to cultivate a more vibrant and competitive contracting ecosystem. DCAP Solution Increased procurement with DC-based small businesses, through DCAP, will create jobs, boost incomes, and generate wealth for District residents, supporting institutional corporate objectives and advancing inclusive prosperity in the District of Columbia.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 73% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 78% for direct work, and 22% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 71
  • Accountability: 91
  • Sustainability: 14
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 90.9%; rating input score 91
  • Program expense ratio: 65.9%; rating input score 66
  • Fundraising efficiency: $22.81 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -37.8%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.77; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.24; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 24.1%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 18.3% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 14% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 17.6% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 90.9% of revenue deployed · 65.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 6 filed program accomplishments · $4.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $339K · 22 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $953K reported
  • Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 14 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 9 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 26/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 31/100.