Coalition for Family Harmony
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 953433822
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Oxnard, CA, USA
- Phone
- 8059836014
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Family Violence Shelters
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,155,383
- Expenses
- $4,499,252
- Assets
- $4,819,793
- Liabilities
- $3,012,979
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- CAROLINE PRIJATEL-SUTTON (EXECUTIVE DIR): $209,027 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To assist families in crisis situations (with priority given to women who have suffered domestic and sexual violence) by providing temporary emergency shelter, food, supportive services, counseling, and legal services. We also support law enforcement venues to ensure victims rights.
What it reported doing in 2024
4) ropp advocacy programin the repeat offender prevention program, we are committed to supporting youth aged 12 to 16 from diverse communities across the region. Our efforts primarily focus on young people from low-income families, many of whom face challenges related to family dysfunction and limited resources. These circumstances often restrict opportunities to participate in pro-social activities that are essential for healthy development.through our programs, we provide youth with the tools, guidance, and support necessary to cultivate positive attitudes and behaviors. This includes organized activities and outings such as trips to museums, professional sports games, local parks, and movies, giving participants meaningful experiences that promote growth, social skills, and resilience. By engaging in these activities, youth are better equipped to navigate their formative years with confidence, hope, and a sense of possibility.through our mentoring program, we are dedicated to supporting youth who face substance abuse challenges, limited parental supervision, and mental health concerns, particularly in the low-income communities of ventura county. Our programs provide a safe and supportive environment where young people can access guidance, resources, and positive role models. By fostering a nurturing and structured setting, we aim to empower participants to overcome obstacles, develop effective coping strategies, and build healthier, more productive futures. Our goal is not only to address their immediate needs but also to inspire long-term resilience, confidence, and hope for sustained well-being.our goal is to provide essential services that help youth navigate the challenges and stressors that can contribute to criminal behavior. Through our programs, we focus on building resilience, offering consistent support, and fostering positive relationships that empower young individuals to make constructive choices. By addressing the underlying issues they face, we aim to reduce the risk of involvement in crime and promote a healthier, more productive path for their future. Ultimately, we strive to create a safe and nurturing environment that encourages personal growth, development, and the ability to resist negative influences.the county, specifically through the ventura county probation agency (vcpa), plays a vital role in funding our initiatives by providing financial support for three youth advocates and a therapist. This investment is part of a broader effort to reduce recidivism among at-risk youth. Vcpa further supports our programs by supplying food for outings outside the county and covering costs for various activities, such as movie outings for the youth. These contributions not only enhance the experiences we offer but also help foster a sense of community and belonging among the participants, ultimately guiding them toward more positive life choices. To encourage our youth's participation, we frequently offer gift cards provided by vcpa as incentives for those who engage in community service or take part in pro-social activities. This approach not only motivates them to get involved but also rewards their efforts and commitment to positive change. By providing these incentives, we aim to foster a sense of accomplishment and reinforce the value of contributing to the community. These small rewards can make a significant difference in encouraging ongoing engagement and helping our youth build a brighter future.accomplishments for fy 2024-2025in our commitment to supporting the youth and families in our community we served 103 clients during fiscal year 24-25. This year, we increased the services provided like assisting youth to get a California id, work permit, birth certificate or other important documents. Youth advocates would often accompany youth to their doctor's appointment or court appearances. We successfully coordinated 66 pro-social activities tailored for our young participants. These initiatives provided
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 89% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 56
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 27
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 94.3%; rating input score 94
- Program expense ratio: 77.5%; rating input score 77
- Fundraising efficiency: $14.62 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -8.3%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.07; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.63; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.6%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.3% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 94.3% of revenue deployed · 77.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 12 filed program accomplishments · $3.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $209K · 12 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $130K reported
- Consistency: 28 of 29 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 50/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 15/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 39/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.