Coalition for Families in Lee Count
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 581960033
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2018
- Forms available
- Form 990 2018
- Location
- Sanford, NC, USA
- Phone
- 9197748144
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community, Neighborhood Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $662,497
- Expenses
- $673,618
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- BRITTANY GARNER (INTERIM ED): $43,368 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our quality of life begins with strong families, which is why the coalition for families is dedicated to finding ways to make sure all lee county families remain strong and vibrant. We are woking to reduce infant mortality and morbidity, prevent teenage pregnancy and provide for other needs of parents and their young children.
What it reported doing in 2018
Ccrr provides referral information to a child care search agency to help parents find quality child care. They also serve as a resource for all child care providers to have access to knowledge and materials that will create a learning environment within their facility. 340 training classes were offered and attended by 340 child care providers serving 1135 children in classrooms. Prep is 3 year teen pregnancy prevention grant. Prep uses an evidence based curriculum called teen outreach program (top). The curriculum has been proven to be effective in reducing teen pregnancy rates through delaying sexual activity and increasing rates of contraceptives. 130 middle and high school students participated in weekly groups for a total of at least 25 groups per year. Each student also completes at least 20 hours of community service learning. Pnc foundation - grow up great grant the pnc grow up great grant helps buy supplies for math and science related activities in child care centers. There were 65 children served, 12 child care teachers served, and 6 child care facilities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 95% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 86
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 20
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 97.1%; rating input score 97
- Program expense ratio: 96%; rating input score 96
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1.7%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.4%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 97.1% of revenue deployed · 96% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 20 of 20 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $647K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $43K · 21 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2010 to 2018
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 31/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 50/100.