Coalition for a Connected West Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
260892802
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2015
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2015
Location
Aurora, CO, USA
Phone
6023636779
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Community, Neighborhood Development

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$47,880
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RANDY SIMMONS (DIRECTOR/PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • RANDY SIMMONS (DIRECTOR/PRESIDENT)
  • MICHAEL PRICE (DIRECTOR/SECRETARY)
  • BRYAN DUNCAN (DIRECTOR/TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Educating consumers and policy makers about emerging issues, promoting policies that foster competition, innovation, and result in more consumer choice access to technology, lower prices and better service; and serving as a voice for consumers on communication issues at the state and local level.

What it reported doing in 2015

Educating consumers and policy makers about emerging communication issues. Promotion of policies that foster competition, innovation, and result in more consumer choice access to technology, lower prices and better service.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 21
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 1
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 56.3%; rating input score 56

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 43.9%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -33.5% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -38.9% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -50.3% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 56.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $27K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2012 to 2015
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.