Coalition Ending Gender-based Violence
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 911504712
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Seattle, WA, USA
- Phone
- 2065685454
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Protection Against Abuse
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $930,944
- Expenses
- $916,650
- Assets
- $595,046
- Liabilities
- $78,161
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- LEA AROMIN (CO-ED - PROG): $116,877 total reported compensation
- AMARINTHIA TORRES (CO-ED - POLI): $111,301 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To end gender-based violence and promote equitable relationships through collective action for social change.
What it reported doing in 2024
Improving funding & public policy this year, the coalition mobilized our community of advocates, survivors, partner organizations, and community members on behalf of gender-based violence programs and the survivors who rely on their support and services. Secured 250k in funding from the city of seattle towards gender-based violence support for survivors who are part of the deaf and hard of hearing community. Secured 250k in funding from the city of seattle towards culturally specific services for latinx survivors of gender-based violence. Mobilized over 55 programs and individuals against legislation proposed by the city council of seattle that would reinstate the previously repealed "prostitution loitering" law and establish a new "stay out of area prostitution" (soap) zone out of concern that the bill would criminalize victims and survivors of gender-based violence and create barriers to much needed services and support. Advocated for increased funding to support survivors of commercial sexual exploitation and a fair and open procurement process resulting in 1.7m in new and ongoing funding for fy 2025 in the city of seattle. Supported the efforts of coalition partners in advocating for consistent inflation adjustments in city of seattle contracts and continued progress in closing the pay penalty and wage gap experienced by the human service sector resulting in a 2% wage equity increase for all city of seattle contracts. Secured 2.2 million for gender-based violence services in the king county budget supporting lifesaving services such as community advocacy, crisis intervention, medical and legal advocacy, shelter, and safety planning. Connecting within and across disciplines survivors of sexual and domestic violence need both service providers and larger community to be coordinated to respond collaboratively to violence and address the gender, racial, and economic disparities that drive violence and abuse. Some of our collective efforts towards our vision of safe and just communities in 2024 included: the monthly family law work group continued to serve a critical role of being the main conduit for information flow between the court, gbv advocates, and attorneys. This group provides peer review and consultation as well as referrals and guidance for attorneys and advocates who are working with ipv survivors and their children. In collaboration with the king county prosecutor's office, we hosted an in-person advocate gathering with 80+ attendees to give community based and systems-based advocates more opportunities to connect, network, and provide cross-training opportunities around topics like support groups and domestic violence protection orders. For domestic violence awareness month, we co-hosted an event with the ywca, kcpao, Washington office of public defense and partnered with member organizations and local businesses to hold an all-day event attended by 100+ individuals to lift up options for healing and justice for survivors. We began a new iteration of partnership between gender-based violence organizations and homeless housing systems through monthly gbv/homelessness collaborative meetings, in partnership with king county regional homelessness authority and city of seattle mayor's office on domestic violence and sexual assault. We partnered with the king county regional homelessness authority and city of seattle modvsa to host the first in-person gender based violence housing and homelessness collaborative gathering to highlight the intersections of gbv and homelessness, highlighting barriers, and brainstorming systemic solutions. This convening was attended by 75+ individuals across gbv, homelessness systems, as well as adjacent systems like mental and substance use. We continued significant coordination with other regional human service groups, including the seattle human services coalition, the king county alliance for human services, and the seattle/king county coalition on homelessness specifically in mobiliza
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 91% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 34
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 82.2%; rating input score 82
- Program expense ratio: 83.4%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: $34.83 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.5%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.65; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 24.9%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 82.2% of revenue deployed · 83.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $765K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $117K · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 38/100.