Coalfield Development Corporation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
263836207
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2011
Location
Wayne, WV, USA
Phone
3045014755
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Housing, Shelter N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$23,383,753
Expenses
$16,197,276
Assets
$35,301,312
Liabilities
$11,973,100

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LARRY CASTLE (PRESIDENT EM)
  • JACOB I HANNAH (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • JACOB I HANNAH (CEO): $104,732 total reported compensation
  • SAM SARCONE (CFO): $96,204 total reported compensation
  • MARILYN WRENN (CHIEF DEVELO): $94,854 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To solve the problem of generational poverty in rural communities caused by extractive mono-economies through four core capabilities: incubation and investing in employment-based social enterprise, facilitating professional, personal, and academic debelopment for people facing barriers to employment,

What it reported doing in 2024

Community and economic development: coalfield development trains unemployed people in modern workforce skills. Throughout the year, we facilitate dozens of learning opportunitites for community members. Our network of employers ensures our training is relevant to their needs. This waym graduates of our training can quickly find gainful employment and our local businesses can have an effective workforce with which to grow. Our most in-depth opportunity is for the personal and academic development of our crew members who staff our social enterprises. Crew members work our 33-6 -3 model where each week they complete 33 hours of paid work, 6 credit hours of higher education, and 3 hours of personal development mentorship. We make up to a three-year employment commitmentto crew members as they earn an associate degree or trade certification and gain traction on life goals. Prior to becoming a crew member, people must complete a six-month course called workforce readiness and professional success (wraps). Wraps trainees are paid for 33 hours of work and three hours of professional development each week. Instead of pursing higher education at this stage, trainees identify barries to long-term employment success an dcan spend up to four hours of their paid time each week working with our human development staff to address these issues. After six months, wraps trainees arebetter prepared to enter the workforces as a 33-6-3 crew member or to be a successful employee outside of coalfield development. It is important to help people imagine what a sustainable, diversified economy can look like and how it can function. Through our program and sector development team we are designing and scaling programs that can tangibly demonstrate what a better economy looks like. Currently, we are incubating programs in sustainable and regenerative agriculture, clean energy, deconstruction and re-use and mine land reclamation. We are also working with nonprofit partners to help build their capacity and expand their place-based workforce training programs. At the same time, we are developing a network of employers who are eager to hire our emerging workforce participants and change their own employment behaviors to be more supportive and engaged in rebuilding the appalachian economy from the ground up.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 92% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 64
  • Transparency & Controls: 85
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 74
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 53%; rating input score 53
  • Program expense ratio: 76.1%; rating input score 76
  • Fundraising efficiency: $80.88 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 81.5%; rating input score 81; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 30.7%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.18; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.34; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.9%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 20.7% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 24.1% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 28.3% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 53% of revenue deployed · 76.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $12.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $105K · 16 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $3M reported
  • Consistency: 30 of 31 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 19 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 14 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 53/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 42/100.