Cmo Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 431427494
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Kearney, NE, USA
- Phone
- 3084408630
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $29,112
- Expenses
- $33,061
- Assets
- $18,023
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of the corporation is to be title holding corpoation for knights of columbus council#1728. Any profits received will be forwarded to knights of columbus council #1728 for charitable purposes. The only business engaged in by the coporation will be the rental of of the building. Tyhe main lessee will bethe knights of columbus #1728, an exempt corporation under section 501 (c) 2.
What it reported doing in 2024
Form 990-ez, part iii - primary exempt purpose the purposee of the corporation is to be title holder coporation for kights of columbus council #1728. Any profits received will be forwarded to the knights of columbus council #1728 foe charitable purposes. The only business engaged in by the coporation will be the rental of the buiding. The main lessee will be the knights of columbus concil #1728, an exempt coporation imder sectio 501 (c) 2. The purpose of the corporation is to be tiltle holding coporation for knights of columbus council #1728. Any profits received will be forwarded to the knights of columbus council #1728 for charitable purposes. The only business engaged in by the coporation will be the rental of the building. The main lessee will be the knights of columbus council #1728, an exempt coporation under section 501 (c) 2.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 29
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -13.6%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.55; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 50.3% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 4 of 5 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 28/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.