Cluster 13

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
161526328
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Camden, NY, USA
Phone
3152455758
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Home Improvement and Repairs

Reported finances

Revenue
$101,197
Expenses
$125,851
Assets
$207,596

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

People named in this filing

  • LESLIE COE (CHAIRMAN)
  • JANE WENHAM (VICE CHAIRMA)
  • JUDITH HOENER (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Housing rehabilitation for low income families to include installation of septic systems, furnaces, handicap ramps, replacement/repair of windows and doors, roofing projects, and electrical and plumbing repairs. In addition, the organization operates a used clothing outlet staffed by all volunteers that provides a source for inexpensive quality clothing to the public, operates a community garden that provides free fresh produce to low income families in the community, and has a helping hands ministry that provides free transportation and other forms of assistance to the elderly and disabled.

What it reported doing in 2024

Housing rehabilitation services to the low income community members that includes installation of septic systems, furnaces, handicap ramps, replacement/repair to windows and doors, roofing projects, and electrical and plumbing services

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 97
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 26
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 91.6%; rating input score 92

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -24.4%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.65; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 45.1%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -1.6% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 91.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $115K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.