Clube Portugues Unidos De Tracy

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
680370903
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2015
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2015
Location
Tracy, CA, USA
Phone
2093215658
Rating
48
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Soccer

Reported finances

Revenue
$27,735
Expenses
$29,764
Assets
$4,377
Liabilities
$5,560

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LUIS A CORREIA (President)
  • LUIS ROCHA (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • LUIS A CORREIA (President)
  • LUIS ROCHA (Vice President)
  • ANTONIO M MEDEIROS (Secretary/TR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To support soccer teams for kids under 18 years of age to keep kids interested in sports and to keep them from being involved in gangs and drugs, to maintain a social place for seniors of portuguese decent for them to socialize and fraternize with their friends and to provide recreation for them by providing entertainment and activities such as card playing, watching soccer games form portugal, folklore groups and instrument playing lessons to maintain our culture alive.

What it reported doing in 2015

We have succefuly organized soccer games for kids under 18 years of age.also card games , folklore groups, guitar lessons dinners and dances for seniors . This keeps our culture alive.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 23
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 26
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 23.3%; rating input score 23
  • Program expense ratio: 21.7%; rating input score 22

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -7.3%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.15; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.27; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -2.7% per year; rating input score 0; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 27.7% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -27.4% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 23.3% of revenue deployed · 21.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $6K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2010 to 2015
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 23/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 22/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 5/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.
  • High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is not authorized to operate as a charity in California.