Club Spa & Fitness Association Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
208836686
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2022
Forms available
Form 990 2017, Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Alexandria, VA, USA
Phone
7032994289
Rating
49
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues

Reported finances

Revenue
$23,709
Expenses
$69,729
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

People named in this filing

  • LUIS BRACAMONTE (CHAIR)
  • BRENDAN CROTTY (VICE CHAIR)
  • LUKASZ MONKA (SECRETARY-TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of club spa & fitness association, inc. Is to set best practices and maintain superior standards and ethics for fitness, spa, and wellness professionals in the private club sector. To accomplish this we adhere to the following objectives:1. Provide our members with the resources and opportunities for educational growth. 2. Work with colleges, universities, and other national certifying entities for fitness and spa in developing curriculums for accreditation. 3. Assist members with career development and job placement opportunities. 4. Provide country club management with highly qualified fitness, spa and wellness professionals. 5. Serve as a resource center for currently trends, quality programming and products. 6. Encourage high ethical standards in working with clients, club management, suppliers, organization members and others.

What it reported doing in 2022

The association provided numerous education conferences and seminars to its members during the year. Through management's efforts, successful club management techniques and other interests were provided to the membership.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 63% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 30
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 10
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 48.5%; rating input score 48
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -194.1%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -2.9% per year; rating input score 0; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.6% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 48.5% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2013 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 48/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.