Clt Bike Camp
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 611805737
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Charlotte, NC, USA
- Phone
- 7049069779
- Rating
- 95
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Youth Development Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $168,287
- Expenses
- $156,424
- Assets
- $42,475
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
People named in this filing
- SAUNDRA LEWIS (MELANIN IN M)
- BETHANIE JOHNSON (EXECUTIVE DI)
- HEATHER RUCKTERSTUHL (TOUR CAMP PL)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Clt bike camp provides bicycle education for children ages 4-15.
What it reported doing in 2024
Clt bike camp provides bicycle education for children ages 4-15. We have programs that serve children just learning to ride, to youth who are looking for more challenging (safe) cycling adventures. We provide scholarships and low cost camps for low income communities as part of our full camp program. Around 1/3 of our budget goes to staff and pay for programs for underserved communities. We use our full cost camp registrations to pay for scholarships and low income programming.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 76% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 96
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 33
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 93%; rating input score 93
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.27; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 20.8%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 37.5% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 26.2% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 93% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $156K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.