Cloud Forest School Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 621532788
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Sewanee, TN, USA
- Phone
- 7174965419
- Rating
- 96
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International, Foreign Affairs, and National Security N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $116,962
- Expenses
- $128,708
- Assets
- $428,674
- Liabilities
- $230
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JED LIPPARD (President)
- REBECCA SKINNER (President)
People named in this filing
- STEPHEN WATTERS (Director)
- JED LIPPARD (President)
- REBECCA SKINNER (President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide support to the cloud forest school known in the republic of costa rica as the centro de education creativa cec, a bilingual, environmentally-focused school located in monteverde, costa rica to support the cec financially through annual giving, restricted giving, capital giving, grant requests through third party donors and foundations, endowment distributions, and other fundraising opportunities that may arise to foster an international network of friends, provides professional development opportunities for staff, and supports teacher and volunteer recruitment to build educational bridges between the cfs/cec and various schools and other educational programs in north america to cloud forest school, inc. 62-1532788 provide logistical support as possible by providing and delivering needed goods and services.
What it reported doing in 2024
Provides support for specific school needs, such as facility construction, repairs, and upgrades, classroom supplies, and general funds that enable the school to control the cost of tuition and fees.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 97
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 47
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 92%; rating input score 92
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -10%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.33; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.2% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.9% per year; rating input score 100; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 92% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $118K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 15/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 52/100.