Clinton Health Access Initiative

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
271414646
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024, Form 990-N 2009
Location
Boston, MA, USA
Phone
6177740110
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
International Relief

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$246,122,771
Expenses
$243,617,406
Assets
$177,238,535
Liabilities
$163,707,305

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

31 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DR NEIL BUDDY SHAH (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)

Highest reported compensation

  • DR NEIL BUDDY SHAH (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $569,969 total reported compensation
  • RASHA HIBRI (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $455,902 total reported compensation
  • JOSHUA CHU (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $378,214 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To save lives and improve health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries by enabling the government and private sector to strengthen and sustain quality health systems. CHAI launches a malaria program, which grows rapidly to help government partners increase funding to combat malaria, improve access to quality diagnosis and treatment, and support evidence-based decision making to target resources and accelerate progress toward elimination.

What it reported doing in 2024

Non-communicable diseases: non-communicable diseases (ncds) such as heart disease, cancer, chronic respiratory disease, and diabetes are the leading cause of death globally, exceeding all communicable disease deaths combined. In addition to our ncd program, which supports governments to strengthen and implement their ncd prevention and control strategies, chai is partnering with governments to strengthen cancer care systems by solving critical systemic gaps. We believe by working in close collaboration with partner governments and by anchoring a suite of transformational interventions, we can dramatically improve survival rates of cancer patients in low- and middle-income countries.cross-cutting experts: chai works with governments and companies around the world to fundamentally change the economics of global health. Using a holistic, business-minded approach to secure lower prices for key commodities such as medication and diagnostics, improve laboratories, and connect decision-makers with the high-quality evidence they need to inform health policy in low- and middle-income countries, chai helps patients access the care and treatment they need. Our science and business experts work across the organization to support our program and country teams. Chai works on both the supply and demand sides of the market to lower costs and increase availability of the best health products for low-and middle-income countries. Working with the public and private sectors, we help shape markets and realize savings for drugs, devices, and diagnostics in all areas of our work. Chai has negotiated over 140 global agreements to lower the prices of critical medications and other health tools by 50-90 percent. Twenty-seven million people living with HIV have been reached by one such agreement lowering the cost of the optimal HIV treatment tld, a savings of over $500 million. Through the global health sciences team, chai aims to reduce costs, improve quality, and increase access to treatment by helping to develop less expensive and more effective versions of critical medications for adults and children; developing techniques and technologies that advance our understanding and management of diseases; and improve patient care. This work has helped accelerate by over two years development, manufacture, regulatory approval, and commercialization of key pediatric HIV products, and saved billions in costs to governments for critical treatments.several new programs have also been added to chai's portfolio in recent years, significantly, assistive technology.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 64% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 84% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 77
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 33
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 89.9%; rating input score 90
  • Program expense ratio: 90.6%; rating input score 91
  • Fundraising efficiency: $73.21 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
    • Requires narrative reports: Limited
    • Conducts field audits: Limited
    • May suspend future funding: Limited
    • Requires financial reports: Limited
    • Conducts site visits: Limited
    • Requires grant agreements: Limited
    • May require repayment: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 97.1%; rating input score 97; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.73; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.92; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.1%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.6% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 14 programs and campaigns described on the official site
  • Where the money goes: 89.9% of revenue deployed · 90.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $220.8M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $570K · 31 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.8M reported
  • Consistency: 35 of 38 current checks pass · 3 findings to review
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 42 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 27 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 37/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 29/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 54/100.