Clinton County Women's Center Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 232143800
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Lock Haven, PA, USA
- Phone
- 5707489539
- Rating
- 89
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Family Violence Shelters
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,041,364
- Expenses
- $1,077,659
- Assets
- $672,112
- Liabilities
- $62,164
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LEAH BOROW (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- TARA MITCHELL (PRESIDENT)
- CHRISTINA MADER (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- LEAH BOROW (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $90,013 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provide crisis intervention, counseling, and shelter; support and empowerment; education, information, and referrals to victims of sexual and domestic violence and to those significant in their lives; and outreach related to the issues of sexual and domestic violence.
What it reported doing in 2024
Our mission is to provide quality services and community collaboration to promote safety and freedom from domestic and sexual violence by empowering individuals to define their own lives. Clinton county women's center, inc., d/b/a roads to peace has been providing services to victims of domestic violence and sexual assault in clinton county since 1979. Our goal is to work toward the elimination of violence through prevention activities, systems advocacy and empowerment. Roads to peace offers free and confidential services 24-hours a day, 7 days a week. Our services include: 24 hour hotline, emergency safe shelter, options/empowerment counseling, support groups, housing advocacy, legal advocacy, lgbtq+ advocacy, medical advocacy, prevention ed & outreach, youth advocacy and referral information. In the 2024-2025 fiscal year roads to peace provided services to 456 survivors of domestic violence and sexual violence.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 92% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 31
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 89.3%; rating input score 89
- Program expense ratio: 86.2%; rating input score 86
- Fundraising efficiency: $1,037.11 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -3.5%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.62; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.4%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 89.3% of revenue deployed · 86.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $929K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $90K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 27/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 29/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: CEO compensation review process not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 42/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 44/100.