Clinton Community School District Veba Trust
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 472311635
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Clinton, IA, USA
- Phone
- 5632439600
- Rating
- 60
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Voluntary Employees Beneficiary Associations (Government)
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $33,473
- Expenses
- $11,036
- Assets
- $102,710
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHAEL HOUSE (BOARD PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MICHAEL HOUSE (BOARD PRESIDENT)
- CINDY MCALEER (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Voluntary nbsp; employees apos; nbsp; beneficiary nbsp; association nbsp; the nbsp; trust nbsp; was nbsp; formed nbsp; for nbsp; the nbsp; sole nbsp; purpose nbsp; of nbsp; funding nbsp; retiree nbsp; health nbsp; care nbsp; benefits nbsp; to nbsp; eligible nbsp; plan nbsp; participants
What it reported doing in 2024
Total expense is comprised of health care benefits paid to eligible participants. Total revenue represents the organizations program-related contributions to the veba trust for the purpose of funding retiree health care benefits to participants.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 95% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Member-benefit provider. The nonprofit used 100% of its reported program spending for member benefits.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 51
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 30
- Sustainability: 77
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 31.4%; rating input score 31
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: Limited
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 67%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 9.31; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -62.4% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -80.1% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -23.5% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 31.4% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $11K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 10 of 11 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 31/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Fund balance restriction sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.