Clinical Endocrine Institute
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 842019951
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Englewood, CO, USA
- Phone
- 3037172324
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $157,800
- Expenses
- $149,266
- Assets
- $31,179
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SUSAN SHERMAN MD (President)
People named in this filing
- MICHAEL MCDERMOTT MD (Director)
- JANE REUSCH MD (Director)
- MICOL ROTHMAN MD (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission of clinical endocrine institute is to improve the quality of life for patients with diabetes and other endocrine disorders. We provide education to physicians and other allied health professioanls with scientific updates that can be translated into practice.
What it reported doing in 2024
An annual conference with multiple experts to educate endocrinologists, primary care physicians, nurse practitioners and other health professionals with an interest in diabetes. Topics include endocrinology as hypercalcemia and osteoporosis updates, transgender legislation, legal topics, hyperthyroidism, thyroid cancer, lipids, obesity, diabetes and hypoglycemia, diabetes technology, new insulins, autoimmune disorders, endocrine effects of cancer, immunotherapies, pituitary, adrenal and more.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 93
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 36
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 91.4%; rating input score 91
- Program expense ratio: 96.6%; rating input score 97
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.4%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.21; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 17.9% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -23.3% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 91.4% of revenue deployed · 96.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $144K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 48/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 19/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.