Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 043503931
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Austin, TX, USA
- Phone
- 5123635826
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Research Institutes and/or Public Policy Analysis
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $8,901,903
- Expenses
- $8,480,440
- Assets
- $3,998,049
- Liabilities
- $2,221,453
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
20 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHRIS DECKER (PRESIDENT & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- CHRIS DECKER (PRESIDENT & CEO): $381,652 total reported compensation
- NICOLE HARMON (CHIEF OPERATIONS OFFICER): $270,224 total reported compensation
- CHARLES SHADLE (HEAD OF DATA SCIENCE OPERATIONS): $219,931 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To create connected standards across the study information lifecycle to enable accessible, interoperable, and reuable data for more meaningful and effective research.
What it reported doing in 2025
In 2024, cdisc introduced a strategic roadmap to expand and enable standards driven automation across the end-to-end study information lifecycle from study design through results. To realize this vision, cdisc is mobilizing its work around three key pillars: expand & connect, enable & automate, and engage & adopt. These three strategic pillars position cdisc and the industry for future innovation and transformation. With expand & connect, we aim to embrace and adopt digital study design, creating connected standards across the clinical research information lifecycle while defining a clear pipeline for integrating new data sources. Through enable & automate, we develop ready-to-use implementation standards that are enabled through technology, reduce variability and focused on interoperability and automation. Finally, engage & adopt establishes a continuous feedback loop across the cdisc community, prioritizing the needs of producers and consumers to lower the barrier to standards use, and increasing communication to better enable our stakeholders.this year, as we celebrated our 25th anniversary highlighting key partnerships, volunteers and impact. We initiated and advanced 360i, moving the industry toward a dynamic and standards-driven data flow with over 80+ contributors leading teams (design, build, and run), innovation challenges, and roundtables to shape the future of clinical research. The design team developed detailed user stories spanning from study design through study amendment and demonstrated the ability to leverage the digital protocol to automate downstream. A key achievement was embedding conformance considerations from the outset, using core and cdisc open rules to ensure standards conformance throughout the lifecycle. The build team successfully generated define.xml and shell datasets from the digital protocol identifying the metadata needed for automation. The run team demonstrated the ability to process data from a wide range of sources (e.g., crf, fhir rwd, dht) and leveraging open source tools to automate the generation of sdtm data sets from upstream digital study design information. Strategic collaborations strengthened this momentum, supporting modernization, expanding digital standards, and improving interoperability across study startup and data exchange. Our events and education offerings also saw strong engagement, building skills, expanding understanding, and fostering deeper alignment across the community.2025 technical milestones: -ai innovation challenge launched to galvanize global innovators to advance the digitization and automation of clinical research through ai, ml, and cdisc standards. With 22 submissions across three technically complex use cases, the challenge delivered practical, standards-driven solutions that strengthen interoperability, accelerate digital protocol development, and enable end-to-end traceability. -cdisc open source alliance (cosa) partnered across the global community met quarterly throughout the year to showcase their open-source solutions including hackathons and more than 15 open source solution demos and 8 oss additions to the repository. -technology vendor roundtable initiated to bring together cdisc members focusing on technology solutions in a collaborative environment to support cdisc's digital transformation. Participants discussed the future of clinical trial innovation by ensuring that cdisc standards are practical and implementable in modern digital workflows. It supports the broader 360i initiative by helping vendors and developers discuss tools that integrate seamlessly with cdisc's structured metadata and digital protocol models. -tmf marked a major milestone as it became the official cdisc tmf standard, transforming tmf rm v4 into version 1 of a unified, interoperable framework for clinical trial documentation. Additionally, the global tmf community advanced into the collaborative cdisc tmf community, embracing a data-driven, machine-readable future th
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 67
- Transparency & Controls: 57
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 68.7%; rating input score 69
- Program expense ratio: 72%; rating input score 72
- Fundraising efficiency: $11.94 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: Scored; rating input score 0
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Scored; rating input score 0
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.7%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.47; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.56; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 19.5%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 68.7% of revenue deployed · 72% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $6.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $382K · 20 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1M reported
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 42/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 14/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.