CLIMB Theatre Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
510189494
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Inver Grove Heights, MN, USA
Phone
6514539275
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Theater

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$731,635
Expenses
$798,572
Assets
$981,036
Liabilities
$1,096,132

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Afton Benson (Managing Director and CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • Afton Benson (Managing Director and CEO): $55,840 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To inspire and propel young people towards acts that benefit themselves, each other and their community.

What it reported doing in 2024

CLIMB reached over 88,000 people in schools, senior centers, and online, through our plays, classes, and other collaborative works! We have continued to focus our programming so youth gain skills in at least one of seven core skills that EMPOWER students: empathy, manners, perseverance, ownership, well-being, equity, and regulation.Classes create safe, age-appropriate spaces for students to explore a wealth of common kid-issues. Every topic CLIMB addresses is well researched and learning outcomes are created to uniquely reach each lesson's goals. Our education works with the teachers and staff at each school and customizes the lesson to students' needs. Through games, scenes, discussion, and role-play, students learn about the topic, while also gaining skills in at least one of five core skill areas: empathy, self-control, resiliency, accountability, and advocacy. In the end, students feel empowered to take action to benefit themselves and their community.Plays are research-based and expertly written to achieve maximum artistic impact and specific educational objectives. Similarly, to the classes, plays address a wide array of important topics by teaching students' relevant life skills. Performed in venues from state-of-the-art theatres to basement cafeterias, CLIMB's innovative sets and costumes can be transported anywhere. Prior to each performance, CLIMB e-mails schools supplemental teacher activities and discussion guides. CLIMB's programming covers any of the following topics: bullying prevention, drug prevention, handling emotions, taking turns/sharing, cliques/exclusion, cyber safety, acceptance of differences, financial literacy, and environmental issues (aquatic invasive species, recycling, waste reduction, water conservation).

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 69
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 29
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 73.7%; rating input score 74
  • Program expense ratio: 67.3%; rating input score 67
  • Fundraising efficiency: $15.59 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -9.1%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.23; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.12; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -5.4% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -2.3% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.7% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 73.7% of revenue deployed · 67.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $538K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $56K · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 52/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 5/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 47/100.