Client Focused Behavioral Health Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 824412299
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
- Phone
- 9546492695
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Counseling, Support Groups
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $165,901
- Expenses
- $147,387
- Assets
- $46,421
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- IVY MARSH (President)
- DANA SARKELA (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- IVY MARSH (President)
- ROSELLE MESSA (Trustee)
- DANA SARKELA (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Client Focused Behavioral Health Inc. is a not-for-profit company dedicated to enhancing the quality of life and self-sufficiency of individuals and families in Florida. Our expertise lies in delivering high-quality, community-based, including Mental and Behavioral Health. We also welcome monetary donations, as well as contributions of food, clothing, hygiene products, and other essentials to support those we serve. Services are provided in homes, office, and Telehealth. All therapists are licensed in the state of Florida, or under the supervision of a licensed therapist.
What it reported doing in 2025
We specialize in delivering high-quality, community-based mental and behavioral health services to children, adolescents, and adults in our office, in their homes, and via telehealth. We also distribute donated food, clothing, hygiene products, and other essentials to support those we serve.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 11.2%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.31; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 63.3%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 23.3% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2019 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.