Cleveland High School Alumni Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 911708220
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Seattle, WA, USA
- Phone
- 2534572122
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alumni Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $174,653
- Expenses
- $121,118
- Assets
- $232,005
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TRACY ARNOLD (PRESIDENT)
- NICOLE WASHINGTON (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- TRACY ARNOLD (PRESIDENT)
- NICOLE WASHINGTON (VICE PRESIDENT)
- TRENA WALKER (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We're a non-profit preserving the cleveland high school memorial forest in perpetuity to honor former cleveland students who gave their lives in service to the USA; supporting educational studies in forestry, ecology, botany and environmental studies of the forest; and supporting and assisting the students and staff of seattle's cleveland high school in their educational activities.
What it reported doing in 2024
Support and preservation of the cleveland memorial forest, honoring our gold star heroes who graduated from cleveland high school in seattle. An annual memorial day event is attended by the junior class of cleveland high school (130 students and 10 staff; plus 25 alumni and guests). Cleveland memorial forest is also used for classroom training (botany). An average of 25 students and 5 teachers attend each training.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 56
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 79
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 48.8%; rating input score 49
- Program expense ratio: 68.8%; rating input score 69
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 30.7%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.92; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 48.8% of revenue deployed · 68.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $83K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 49/100.