Cleveland Bike Life Cuties
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 844847739
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2022
- Location
- Garfield Heights, OH, USA
- Phone
- 2163179446
- Rating
- 89
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Service Clubs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,919
- Expenses
- $6,278
- Assets
- $2,872
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Amina Sterling (President)
- Tiana Allen (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Amina Sterling (President)
- Tiana Allen (Vice President)
- Selena Melendez (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization's primary exempt purpose is for charity and to fundraise, of which those funds get disbursed to families in the local community that are struggling financially.
What it reported doing in 2022
The organization intends to provide the community with several free events to help promote social unity in the local area. The organization has conduct several Easter community event for the children and families in the local area. The organization has hosted several local ride for motorist to enjoy for recreation and pleasure. The organization has also conducted a turkey giveaway for Thanksgiving to the local Cleveland community. The organization has also assisted in hosting a senior citizen BINGO game for recreation.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 90
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 91.6%; rating input score 92
- Program expense ratio: 86.4%; rating input score 86
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -6.1%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.46; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -42.5% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -11.8% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 91.6% of revenue deployed · 86.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2021 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 37/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 26/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.