Clermont 2020 Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
311307768
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2011
Forms available
Form 990 2011
Location
Batavia, OH, USA
Phone
5135826150
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Job Training

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$20,938
Expenses
$149,682
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

20 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To serve as a catalyst to bring people together to improve the quality of life in Clermont County, Ohio

What it reported doing in 2011

Education Leadership - Eight individuals attend program that expanded Clermont educational opportunities - in partnership with area schools and the Ohio College Access Network (OCAN), the program guides high school and career campus students through one-on-one advisory meetings with students and financial aid workshops for parents, in 2007 nearly 3600 students were served by the program. In addition, a high-school mentoring program was started to recruit mentors to work with promising but at risk students throughout their high school years. The mentors encourage the students to stay in school, go to college, build self-esteem and develop life skills to enrich their lives and strengthen the community. The programs has been very successful on the campuses of Amelia, Glen Este, CNE, Williamsburg and Live Oaks.Community Development Center (CDC) - The CDC focuses on affordable housing, community organizing and economic revitalization. 11.5 acres of land was purchased and development has begun on 28 affordable new homes in the Franklin Landing development. Site construction began in July 2008 and the first model home will be under construction. The "Don't Borrow Trouble" campaign program was organized to decrease inappropriate mortgage lending and foreclosures through outreach, education, counseling, legal assistance and advocacy. The land was sold on May 20, 2010.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 81% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 79
  • Sustainability: 5
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -614.9%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 13.4%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -162.8% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -200% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $135K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $20K · 20 people listed
  • Consistency: 16 of 16 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2010 to 2011
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.